A Satellaview research blog.

On matters directly affecting the blog’s quality: YouTube betrayed me.

I will once again sincerely apologize for the hoopla surrounding the video embeds lately. You see, YouTube has been swindling me. I’ve commented on this prior in my Twitter, and I’ll summarize the past month of this malarky here.

To start, back on November 2nd – the same day as the forced Google+ integrations, if you recall – YouTube abruptly disables monetization on my original channel. In a panic I tried changing my channel and moving stuff over, only for them to, 20 days later, disable the monetization on THAT, as well, SPECIFICALLY CITING my previous account. YouTube will not even let me start over.

I will note that both accounts were completely in good standing when this happened, and I had no prior warnings or incidents to explain this. The timing of it, in fact, gave me the perception that they simply wanted to screw over a legacy YouTube user for their “Fresh new thing” in the Google+ integration.

As I struggled with trying to speak to them (Help Center has not responded to any of my messages, and the support forum abruptly stopped talking to me the moment I noticed a contradiction between their stated policy and the reality of my circumstances.), something ELSE happened that rubbed the salt deeper into the wound.

The attack of the ghost of 4Kids.

This video was copyright striked:

Under a claim by the supposed “4Kids”.

Now, cast aside all prior thought on this, and let’s get this fact straight: 4Kids has been defunct for over a year, and no longer owned anything in that video. Furthermore, the very e-mail domain main of the alleged claimer was nonfunctional. In other words, there was no one going to be on the receiving end of the inevitable counter-claim I made, which is why this video is back up.

But, the question is, why? Not just why it happened at all, but why the TIMING of it? I had that video up for TWO YEARS, and during the time 4Kids was alive, they knew, because they already had that claim on my video WITHOUT copyright striking it.

Combined with the lack of a 4Kids in the current day, and… it’s quite apparent, YouTube (under Google’s ownership, so as to not cause confusion with the legacy of YouTube, as I’ve been a member of the site since 2006) THEMSELVES did this.
To give them the benefit of the doubt, I’d presume they tried strengthening their copyright bots and just neglected to remove the claims from an obviously-defunct company… but still! This is the most outrageous thing that’s ever happened to me in my entire time on the internet yet! And with how it was timed, it’d be easy to believe they were intentionally trying to take me down! This is SICKENING.

Some kind of action needs to be done. These sorts of issues with YouTube can’t stand.
They should NOT be allowed to harass their community like this, especially with money on the line.

I think sooner or later I’m going to contact a lawyer…

7 thoughts on On matters directly affecting the blog’s quality: YouTube betrayed me.

  1. Since Nintendo joining the Content ID and Google+ things, here is the shit:
    1. After Google+ intergration, it appears to be impossible to reply to older comments, because there is no reply button.

    2. Nintendo already put ads on my OoT playtrough (not all parts… yet). They are still available worldwide, account is in good standing, and abilitity to upload videos longer than 15 minutes is active. However, I don’t want to lose that. I would like to know more information about Content ID – which factors can switch this into Not in Good Standing?

    Officially, YT says “when you get a video blocked worldwide, but I think there might be more hidden factors, like;
    – too many videos with Content ID matches (status doesn’t matter)
    – too many videos blocked is some countries (like Germany)

    If either of these is true, that bad, because I would like to upload a playthrough of Castlevania: Rondo of Blood. SME owns the rights to the music and blocks this in Germany. I’ve already tried uploading this in the past, but after screwing in one level, I’ve decided to remove the whole thing.

    Also, copyright owner can change mind, request removal (resulting in copyright strike), but that’s different thing.

Add Your Comment

* Indicates Required Field

Your email address will not be published.